Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.

Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.

Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.
 

VALIDITY

1. Are the results of the study valid (i.e., trustworthy and credible)?

    a. How were study participants chosen?

    b. How were accuracy and completeness of data assured?

    c. How plausible/believable are the results?

      i. Are implications of the research stated?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. May new insights increase sensitivity to others’ needs?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. May understandings enhance situational competence?
Yes
No
Unknown

    d. What is the effect on the reader? ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

        1. Are results plausible and believable?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Is the reader imaginatively drawn into the experience?
Yes
No
Unknown

 
RELIABILITY

2. What were the results?

    a. Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study?
Yes
No
Unknown

      i. How does the researcher identify the study approach?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Are language and concepts consistent with the approach?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Are data collection and analysis techniques appropriate?
Yes
No
Unknown

      ii. Is the significance/importance of the study explicit?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Does review of the literature support a need for the study?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. What is the study’s potential contribution?

      iii. Is the sampling strategy clear and guided by study needs?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Does the researcher control selection of the sample?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Do sample composition and size reflect study needs?
Yes
No
Unknown

    b. Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified?

      i. Are data collection procedures clear?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Are sources and means of verifying data explicit?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Are researcher’s roles and activities explained?
Yes
No
Unknown

      ii. Are data analysis procedures described?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Does analysis guide direction of sampling and when it ends?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Are data management processes described?
Yes
No
Unknown

    c. What are the reported results (description or interpretation)?

      i. How are specific findings presented?

        1. Is presentation logical, consistent, and easy to follow?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Do quotes fit the findings they are intended to illustrate?
Yes
No
Unknown

      ii. How are overall results presented?

        1. Are meanings derived from data described in context?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Does the writing effectively promote understanding?
Yes
No
Unknown

 
APPLICABILITY

3. Will the results help me in caring for my patients?

    a. Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations?
Yes
No
Unknown

    b. Are the results relevant to patient’s values and/or circumstances?
Yes
No
Unknown

    c. How may the results be applied in clinical practice?

 
 
Would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?

If yes, how?
If yes, why?
If no, why not?

VALIDITY

1. Are the results of the study valid (i.e., trustworthy and credible)?

a.       How were study participants chosen?
A purposive sampling frame was used to recruit study participants
 

    b. How were the accuracy and completeness of data assured?
Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Group observations were performed to triangulate the data collected through interviews. Data analysis was done by an AC who had not been involved in the client group. Samples of the transcripts were coded by a CN independently which reduced bias (Croxford et al, 2015). Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.

    c. How plausible/believable are the results?

      i. Are implications of the research stated?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. May new insights increase sensitivity to others’ needs?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. May understandings enhance situational competence?
Yes
No
Unknown

    d. What is the effect on the reader?

        1. Are results plausible and believable?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Is the reader imaginatively drawn into the experience?
Yes
No
Unknown

 
RELIABILITY

2. What were the results?

    a. Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study?
Yes
No
Unknown

      i. How does the researcher identify the study approach?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Are language and concepts consistent with the approach?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Are data collection and analysis techniques appropriate?
Yes
No
Unknown

      ii. Is the significance/importance of the study explicit?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Does review of the literature support a need for the study?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. What is the study’s potential contribution?
The study adds to the knowledge regarding the importance of preparing individuals for alcohol detoxification. Adequate preparation for example through group CBT can reduce the rate of withdrawal from the detoxification program and also motivate the participants (Croxford et al, 2015).  Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.

      iii. Is the sampling strategy clear and guided by study needs?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Does the researcher control selection of the sample?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Do sample composition and size reflect study needs?
Yes
No
Unknown

    b. Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified?

      i. Are data collection procedures clear?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Are sources and means of verifying data explicit?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Are researcher’s roles and activities explained?
Yes
No
Unknown

      ii. Are data analysis procedures described?
Yes
No
Unknown

        1. Does analysis guide direction of sampling and when it ends?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Are data management processes described?
Yes
No
Unknown

    c. What are the reported results (description or interpretation)?

      i. How are specific findings presented?

        1. Is presentation logical, consistent, and easy to follow?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Do quotes fit the findings they are intended to illustrate?
Yes
No
Unknown

      ii. How are overall results presented?

        1. Are meanings derived from data described in context?
Yes
No
Unknown

        2. Does the writing effectively promote understanding?
Yes
No
Unknown

 
APPLICABILITY

3. Will the results help me in caring for my patients?

    a. Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations?
Yes
No
Unknown

    b. Are the results relevant to patient’s values and/or circumstances?
Yes
No
Unknown

b.      How may the results be applied in clinical practice?
The findings can be applied by always adequately preparing clients for the detoxification process. This can provide the clients with the psychosocial support they need to go through detoxification (Croxford et al, 2015). Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.

 
 
 
Would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?
Yes. I would use the study findings by ensuring that clients choosing to go for a detoxification process are adequately prepared to go through the process. the reason why I would use the findings is to prepare the client for the recovery journey and prepare the clients for the lifestyle changes essential to start a new life without drinking. In addition, application of these findings would give the clients the necessary psychosocial and psychological support they need to go through the detoxification process (Croxford et al, 2015). Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.
 
Additional Comments/Reflections:
Adequate preparation of the client for the detoxification process is necessary. However, it is important to emphasize to the clients that it is their responsibility to change; however, empathy should be expressed when preparing clients for the detoxification process.
 
 
Recommendation for article use within a body of evidence:
The study findings can be used in practice. Clients undergoing alcohol detoxification process need to be adequately prepared in order to increase the success rate of finishing the detoxification process. group therapy is specifically effective because clients get support and motivation from each other to go through the process. In addition, adequate preparation can provide clients with coping strategies, psychosocial support, as well as prepare clients for a new life without drinking (Croxford et al, 2015). Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.
 
© Fineout-Overholt & Melnyk 2005. This form may be used for educational, practice change & research purposes without permission.
 
Written Summary
The results of the article are valid because the research methodology was reliable. For example, purposive sampling ensured that the sample was representative of the population. The accuracy and completeness of data were ensured by recording the interviews and transcribing verbatim. The collected data was also triangulated through observation. Secondly, the study results are reliable because the appropriate research methodology was used during the study. Therefore, the study findings can be applied to practice. The findings can be applied by ensuring clients undergo psychotherapy before the detoxification process. For example, group CBT can not only prepare the client for the process but can also provide them with the motivation and psychosocial support they need to go through the detoxification process. Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence.

Our Essay Writing Service Features

Qualified Writers
Looming deadline? Get your paper done in 6 hours or less. Message via chat and we'll get onto it.
Anonymity
We care about the privacy of our clients and will never share your personal information with any third parties or persons.
Free Turnitin Report
A plagiarism report from Turnitin can be attached to your order to ensure your paper's originality.
Safe Payments
The further the deadline or the more pages you order, the lower the price! Affordability is in our DNA.
No Hidden Charges
We offer the lowest prices per page in the industry, with an average of $7 per page
24/7/365 Support
You can contact us any time of day and night with any questions; we'll always be happy to help you out.
$15.99 Plagiarism report
$15.99 Plagiarism report
$15.99 Plagiarism report
$15.99 Plagiarism report
$3.99 Outline
$21.99 Unlimited Revisions
Get all these features for $65.77 FREE
Do My Paper

Frequently Asked Questions About Our Essay Writing Service

Academic Paper Writing Service

Our essay writers will gladly help you with:

Essay
Business Plan
Presentation or Speech
Admission Essay
Case Study
Reflective Writing
Annotated Bibliography
Creative Writing
Report
Term Paper
Article Review
Critical Thinking / Review
Research Paper
Thesis / Dissertation
Book / Movie Review
Book Reviews
Literature Review
Research Proposal
Editing and proofreading
Other
Find Your Writer

Latest Feedback From Our Customers

Customer ID:  # 678224
Research Paper
Highly knowledgeable expert, reasonable price. Great at explaining hard concerts!
Writer: Raymond B.
08/10/2021
Customer ID: # 619634
Essay (any type)
Helped me with bear and bull markets right before my exam! Fast teacher. Would work with Grace again.
Writer: Lilian G.
08/10/2021
Customer ID: # 519731
Research Paper
If you are scanning reviews trying to find a great tutoring service, then scan no more. This service elite!
Writer: Grace P.
08/10/2021
Customer ID: #499222
Essay (any type)
This writer is great, finished very fast and the essay was perfect. Writer goes out of her way to meet your assignment needs!
Writer: Amanda B.
08/10/2021
Place an Order

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
×

Powered by essayworldwide.com

× WhatsApp Us