MBA7503 managing organizations
Introduction: provides an overview of the article’s purpose and main argument and offers the writer’s thesis regarding the article’s strengths and weaknesses. ·
Summary paragraph: briefly reviews the article’s key points. ·
Assessment paragraphs: analyze the article’s strengths and weaknesses. In discussing strengths, the writer can point to the article’s inclusion of pertinent historical context, persuasive interpretations, thorough explication of evidence, or conclusions that apply to the topic at hand. In critiquing weaknesses, the writer can examine the article’s ineffective use of evidence, inaccuracy, unconvincing readings of the material, failure to explore ideas within the scope of the main argument. ·
Conclusion: presents commentary on the article’s overall usefulness. The writer should address the extent to which the article helps readers to understand the topic.
2. Effective critiques will cover the article’s significant points. A critique that ignores the article’s main argument or concentrates on ideas mentioned parenthetically suggests a lack of comprehension on the writer’s part.
3. Avoid composing a critique that solely addresses the article’s strengths. Such critiques tend to read as summaries rather than assessments.
4. Although you need not present a balanced opinion of the article, you must be fair. A single article cannot address every aspect of a topic or touch on every bit of context/evidence that might support its thesis. Consequently, a valid assessment of weaknesses will not raise points that fall outside the article’s scope or purpose.
5. Remember to justify your analysis of strengths and weaknesses with evidence from the article and the course literature (and beyond!?).
Our essay writers will gladly help you with: