LAWS1010 Legal System And Method

Free Samples

LAWS1010 Legal System And Method

.cms-body-content table{width:100%!important;} #subhidecontent{ position: relative;
overflow-x: auto;
width: 100%;}

LAWS1010 Legal System And Method

0 Download7 Pages / 1,730 Words

Course Code: LAWS1010
University: The University Of Newcastle

MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Australia

Questions:
1. Did Travis commit an offence under section 5 of the prohibited group (Anti-terrorist) Act?
2. Was Travis part of the prohibited group?

Answers:
Introduction
The issue in this case is to interpret the provisions of the prohibited groups (Anti-terrorism) Act in order to determine whether Travis is liable for the breach of section 5, Wendy, section 3 and 5 a, and Linda, section 4 and 5 of the same Act. We are dealing with commonwealth jurisdiction. The act came into effect on August 1. The federal police charged Wendy, Linda and Travis under the statute.
As far as the traditional approach is concerned, there are three basic rules of statutory interpretation, which are divided into Golden Rule, Literal Rule and Mischief Rule. According to section 6A of the interpretation Act 1979, a provision of an Act has to be constructed with respect to purpose of the Act and must not exceed the power, which have been provided by the Act.
According to the golden rule of interpretation, natural and ordinary meaning is given to statute unless there is any ambiguity. The object of the Act is to prevent terrorist Act and extremist violence by any prohibited group that seeks to further violence or pursue their goal through violence. The Act through section 2 provides that a terrorist act is any unlawful act committed in the furtherance of political or religious ideology for the purpose of damaging property or life. Further, the same section defines prohibited groups as any groups formed with the aim of committing terrorist and related act. 
Issue A
Did Travis commit an offence under section 5 of the prohibited group (Anti-terrorist) Act?
Was Travis part of the prohibited group?
Rules
Prohibited group is defined in the act as any group formed for the purpose of committing terrorist and related act. With regard to section 5, it is convenient to say that the words defining the terrorist act are not clear. They are absurd; thus, the Golden rule of interpretation can be used in this case. The rule states that in any interpretation of statutes, unless the ordinary sense of the words would lead to some absurdity, or inconsistency, with the rest of the provision, the ordinary meaning of words must be used.
The High Court of Australia has endorsed few principals which are needed to give a proper meaning to legislation. And the most important states that when the legislation expressly provides the law which is applicable, the appropriate point where to start the analysis of the law is the text of the legislation and not any common law or elaborations of the provisions by courts.
Further, the court emphasized that considering the words used in the statute, separately to bring out the meaning of word and establish the intention of the parliament in relation to a provision, cannot be interpreted as an appropriate approach. The meaning of the word must be analyzed in the context in which it appears in the legislation.
Application
For Travis to be found guilty of an offence under the prohibited groups (Anti-terrorist) Act 2017, he must be found to form, join, distribute information on behalf of, or promotes, the activities of a prohibited group. Travis was part of the group that was formed with the purpose of stopping the killing of animal for food. And as part of such group, he sent a massage on Facebook inciting others to protest. He also kept a watch while the plan was carried out and streamed what was happing inside the factory on Facebook.
It need to be determined whether Travis’ acts amount to a promotion of terrorist Activities as contemplated in the section of the prohibited groups Act. Therefore, to interpret the words of legislation, Judges are required to examine the total sentence together with the paragraphs and the provisions immediately surrounding the rule (1).
It is likely that any interpretation using the golden rule would suggest that Travis will not be found guilty of breaching section 5 of the prohibited group (Anti-terrorist) Act. The Act provides for 18 months imprisonment for the breach of this section.
Conclusion
Travis cannot be construed as guilty.
Issue B
Did Wendi commit an offence under section 3 of the Act?
Was Wendi a member of a prohibited group?
Rule
The section does not provide a clear definition of Terrorist Act. It however provides a general definition that would encompass any unlawful act done in the furtherance of political or religious ideology with the objects of damaging property or life. According to literal rule of interpretation, emphasized by Higgins J in Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaid Steamship Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 129, statute must be interpreted to bring out the ordinary meaning of the words or phrases according to the intent of the Parliament.
Further, the application of literal approach would simply produce an unintended or absurd result as was established in Footscray city college v Ruzicka(2007) 16 VR 498. Thus, the needs of applying the golden rule. In Carr v the State of Western Australia, the court had to consider both the text, legislation, and the purpose at the overall context where the text fits in the legislation.
Application
In order to establish Wendy guilty of an offence under section 3, it is essential to prove that she committed a terrorist act, while being a member of a prohibited group.  Wendy carried out the plan. She burnt the lock off the front door with the aim of exposing the animal killing. Since it is known at this stage that the intention of the legislature is the prevention of terrorist threats, the application of the golden rule would take the purpose of the Act into consideration.
Conclusion
Thus, it can be said that Wendy’s act does not fall within the sphere of the object of the Act, which is to prevent acts amounting to terrorist threats. However, it needs to be determined whether Wendy’s act amounts to a terrorist act in relation to the Act.
Issue C
Did Wendy commit an offence under section 5 of the prohibited group (Anti-terrorist) Act 2017?
Was Wendy part of the prohibited group?
Rule
Section 2B of the Act defines a prohibited group as any group formed with the purpose of committing terrorist and related act. This definition is somewhat ambiguous which raises the necessity to use the golden rule in ascertaining the meaning of the term prohibited. The Golden rule approach advocates for a legislative interpretation that would avoid unintended or absurd results. Footscray city v ruzicka (2007)
Application
Wendy, like Travis and Linda, have been charged with s5 offence. To establish her guilty of an offence under the prohibited groups (Anti- terrorist) Act 2017, it must be established that she formed, joined, distributed information on behalf of, or promoted activities of a prohibited group. On the facts here, Wendy set up a camera inside the factory with the aim of streaming what was happening inside the factory on Facebook. With knowledge of the intent of the prohibited group Act, it is safe to suggest that Wendy’s act does not fall within the sphere of practices that amounts to terrorist activity in this Act. This is because the intention of the legislature was simply a prevention of threat of terrorism.
Conclusion
Therefore, it is unlikely that Wendy would be found guilty of offence under section 5 of the prohibited group Act. 
Issue D
Did Linda commit an offence under section 4 of the Act?
Does Linda act amount to supplying a terrorist group?
Rule
The essential element of section 4 is supplying, weapon or dangerous goods to terrorist groups. And the breach of this section will attract either a fine of $10000 or 1-year imprisonment. The Act defines the term weapon includes knives, spears, swords and other tools which implies that the definition is ambiguous and not clear. The literal approach to statutory interpretation advocate for the use of ordinary meaning of the word in order to not to depart from the intention and purpose of the legislature . Additionally, the golden rule can be invoked where there a clear limitation of the literal approach to avoid patently unintended or absurd results in the construction of legislation as was established in Footscray City College v Ruzicka (2007).
Application
In order to establish Linda to be guilty of an offence under this section of the Act, it must be proved that she supplied weapons or dangerous goods to terrorist intentionally with complete knowledge about the fact. The facts of the case show that Linda provided the bold cutters and the welder to Wendy for carrying out the plan that consisted in cutting a hole into the wire fence, burn the lock off and then set the camera inside and informed media to stream what was happening inside the factory. She did not supply any dangerous weapons with an intention to cause terror amongst people.
Conclusion
Hence, she cannot be said to have commited an offence under section 4 of the Act.
Issue E
Did Linda commit an offence under section 5 of the Act?
Was Linda part of prohibited group?
Rule
The Act does not define the word ‘promote’. The application of the literal approach of statute interpretation would result in the word keeping its natural and ordinary meaning as was ruled in the (Engineers’ case) (1920) 28 CLR 129. Furthermore, the section reserves 18 months imprisonment for non-compliance with that Act.
Application
As it was stressed above in the analysis of section 5 under which Wendi and Travis were charge, to establish Linda as guilty of an offence under the said section, it is important to prove that she formed part of the prohibited group and/or have been engaged in promoting terrorist activities of such group.  Linda was alleged to supply dangerous weapons but she did not have the intention to cause terrorist activities and neither the group intended to promote terrorist activities.   
Linda was not a part of the prohibited group neither she committed an offence under section 5 of the Act. 
Conclusion
Therefore, considering the text, purpose and the position of the text of legislation it is easy to determine the fact Travis, Linda and Wendy are unlikely to be found liable under section 5 of the prohibited groups (Anti-terrorist) Act 2017. Because this Act seeks to prevent terrorist and violent act perpetrated by “prohibited group”. Here, neither Travis, Wendi nor Lindy form part of any terrorist group. In addition, Wendy would likely not be found liable of offence under section 3, neither would Linda, because they do not form part of a terrorist group as contemplated in the Act.

Free Membership to World’s Largest Sample Bank

To View this & another 50000+ free samples. Please put
your valid email id.

E-mail

Yes, alert me for offers and important updates

Submit 

Download Sample Now

Earn back the money you have spent on the downloaded sample by uploading a unique assignment/study material/research material you have. After we assess the authenticity of the uploaded content, you will get 100% money back in your wallet within 7 days.

UploadUnique Document

DocumentUnder Evaluation

Get Moneyinto Your Wallet

Total 7 pages

PAY 5 USD TO DOWNLOAD

*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as
unique.

Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

APA
MLA
Harvard
OSCOLA
Vancouver

My Assignment Help. (2021). Legal System And Method. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/laws1010-legal-system-and-method/traditional-approach.html.

“Legal System And Method.” My Assignment Help, 2021, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/laws1010-legal-system-and-method/traditional-approach.html.

My Assignment Help (2021) Legal System And Method [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/laws1010-legal-system-and-method/traditional-approach.html[Accessed 18 December 2021].

My Assignment Help. ‘Legal System And Method’ (My Assignment Help, 2021) accessed 18 December 2021.

My Assignment Help. Legal System And Method [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2021 [cited 18 December 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/laws1010-legal-system-and-method/traditional-approach.html.

×
.close{position: absolute;right: 5px;z-index: 999;opacity: 1;color: #ff8b00;}

×

Thank you for your interest
The respective sample has been mail to your register email id

×

CONGRATS!
$20 Credited
successfully in your wallet.
* $5 to be used on order value more than $50. Valid for
only 1
month.

Account created successfully!
We have sent login details on your registered email.

User:

Password:

MyAssignmenthelp.com has become preferred online assignment help provider in Australia due to its efficiency and professionalism. Our highly skilled assignment writers work day in and day out to resolve students’ doubts ‘can I do my assignment perfectly’ or ‘will I able to write my assignment exactly in a manner that professors want’ and provide them needed Assignment Help. Hence, students, who avail our services, get the chance to secure higher grades.

Latest Management Samples

div#loaddata .card img {max-width: 100%;
}

MPM755 Building Success In Commerce
Download :
0 | Pages :
9

Course Code: MPM755
University: Deakin University

MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Australia

Answers:
Introduction
The process of developing a successful business entity requires a multidimensional analysis of several factors that relate to the internal and external environment in commerce. The areas covered in this current unit are essential in transforming the business perspective regarding the key commerce factors such as ethics, technology, culture, entrepreneurship, leadership, culture, and globalization (Nzelibe, 1996; Barza, 2…
Read
More

SNM660 Evidence Based Practice
Download :
0 | Pages :
8

Course Code: SNM660
University: The University Of Sheffield

MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: United Kingdom

Answers:
Critical reflection on the objective, design, methodology and outcome of the research undertaken Assessment-I
Smoking and tobacco addiction is one of the few among the most basic general restorative issues, particularly to developed nations such as the UK. It has been represented that among all risk segments smoking is the fourth driving purpose behind infections and other several ailments like asthma, breathing and problems in the l…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia Maidstone Management Business management with marketing University of New South Wales Masters in Business Administration 

BSBHRM513 Manage Workforce Planning
Download :
0 | Pages :
20

Course Code: BSBHRM513
University: Tafe NSW

MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Australia

Answer:
Task 1
1.0 Data on staff turnover and demographics
That includes the staffing information of JKL industries for the fiscal year of 2014-15, it can be said that the company is having problems related to employee turnover. For the role of Senior Manager in Sydney, the organization needs 4 managers; however, one manager is exiting. It will make one empty position which might hurt the decision making process. On the other hand, In Brisba…
Read
More

MKT2031 Issues In Small Business And Entrepreneurship
Download :
0 | Pages :
5

Course Code: MKT2031
University: University Of Northampton

MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: United Kingdom

Answer:
Entrepreneurial ventures
Entrepreneurship is the capacity and willingness to develop, manage, and put in order operations of any business venture with an intention to make profits despite the risks that may be involved in such venture. Small and large businesses have a vital role to play in the overall performance of the economy. It is, therefore, necessary to consider the difference between entrepreneurial ventures, individual, and c…
Read
More
Tags:
Turkey Istanbul Management University of Employee Masters in Business Administration 

MN506 System Management
Download :
0 | Pages :
7

Course Code: MN506
University: Melbourne Institute Of Technology

MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Australia

Answer:
Introduction
An operating system (OS) is defined as a system software that is installed in the systems for the management of the hardware along with the other software resources. Every computer system and mobile device requires an operating system for functioning and execution of operations. There is a great use of mobile devices such as tablets and Smartphones that has increased. One of the widely used and implemented operating syste…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia Cheltenham Computer Science Litigation and Dispute Management University of New South Wales Information Technology 

Next