HRMT 3020 Talent Management

HRMT 3020 Talent Management
Question
Answered

Question:
OBHR Comparative Case Study
Prepare a 2000 words comparative case study. Adhere to the following format while preparing the case study.  
 
1. Choose two well documented case studies of different organizations. 

2. One case study should be based on success story of an airline company   

3. Other case study should focus on organizational failure/project failure of some other airline company

4. Analyze the organizational structure and culture for both organizations. 
 
5. What is the mode of communication adopted by both organizations? How do employees interact with each other? 

6. What kind of leadership style these organizations prefer/follow? What is the management style of both organizations? 

7. Explain how the organizational culture, structure and management style effects/relates to the success and failure of the organization?

8. What is the HR Strategic planning, recruitment and selection strategy, performance/ talent management strategy of both the organizations?
 
9. Based on the analysis performed propose suggestions and recommendations (5-6) based on the OBHR concepts learned in the course for both organizations. 

 My suggestion is to  Choose airline industry and comare those two industries
Report Requirements  
1. The report must include a title page, table of contents, introduction, multiple supporting body paragraphs, conclusion and list of references.  

2. Students must use a minimum of 10 references. All references must come from peer-reviewed academic journals; additional references may be from trade and practitioner publications or online search engines.  

3. Students must use APA format when citing literature. 

4.Students are encouraged to use Grammarly to avoid plagiarism. If plagiarism is identified in the paper, the student will receive a zero for the assignment.  

Do not exceed the word-limit. Marks will be deducted for excessive length. 
Assessment Rubric:

1-4 Scale

1

2

3

4

Percentage Score

Weight

0-59

60-67

68-71

72-75

76-79

80-84

85-89

90-100

Grades

F

C

B-

B

B+

A-

A

A+

Mastery Level

Beginning

Developing

Competent

Mastery

Standard Level

Below Standard

Approaching Standard

At Standard

Exceeds Standard

Executive Summary/
Abstract

5

Executive summary or Abstract missing or poorly constructed

Executive summary or Abstract inadequate

Executive Summary or Abstract Executed Adequately

Executive Summary or Abstract Executed in Superior Fashion

Problem Identification & Scope

10

Shows little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.

Shows some understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.

Shows adequate knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.

Shows superior knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.

Content

10

Does not address the case question with little relevant evidence (e.g., details, examples, facts, and expert opinions)

Central idea and clarity of purpose are absent or incompletely expressed and maintained

Lacks most of the necessary case parts

Does not comments on (/evaluates) the differences

Not all the major similarities and / or differences have been a (e.g., details, examples, facts, and expert opinions)

Includes only a few of the necessary case parts

Central idea and clarity of purpose are expressed though perhaps too vaguely or broadly

Only minimally comments on (/evaluates) the differences

Generally, addresses the case question by providing most major similarities and / or differences but loses focus at times by focusing on minor details

Uses a few details, examples, facts, and expert opinions to elaborate on similarities and / or differences

Includes most of the necessary case parts

Comments on (/evaluates) some of the differences

Addresses the case question by providing all major similarities and / or differences

Uses some details, examples, facts, and expert opinions) to elaborate on the similarities and / or differences

Includes all the case parts

Comments on (/evaluates) the differences

Case Analysis

15

Analysis of case poor analysis of issues of the case, supporting detail is incorrect or missing

Analysis of case shows inadequate levels of analysis of issues of the case, provides little supporting detail

Analysis of case shows adequate levels of analysis of issues of the case, provides supporting details

Analysis of case shows superior levels of analysis of underlying issues that are not necessarily readily apparent, uses appropriate levels of supporting detail

Recommendation and Conclusions

10

Recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are mostly incorrect or absent

Recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are partially correct, alternate viewpoints not considered

Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are substantially correct, alternate viewpoints may be considered

Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided that go beyond the expected scope of the case fully supported by data, alternate viewpoints fully considered

Organization & Critical Thinking

Coherence, Cohesion, organization, demonstration of thought process, analysis of problem using own thoughts and ideas

20

Similarities and differences have been clearly organized using either the block or thematic method.

Very clear relationship between ideas

Accurate use of connectors

Accurate use of pronouns

Clear match between the topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence in each body paragraph

Similarities and differences are organized generally clearly using the block or thematic method but one of the paragraphs may cover more than one main idea

Generally clear relationship between ideas

Mostly correct use of connectors.

Mostly correct use of pronouns

The topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence (if any) support one main idea.

Similarities and differences are organized generally clearly using the block or thematic method but one of the paragraphs may cover more than one main idea

Generally clear relationship between ideas

Mostly correct use of connectors.

Mostly correct use of pronouns

The topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence (if any) support one main idea.

Similarities and differences have been clearly organized using either the block or thematic method.

Very clear relationship between ideas

Accurate use of connectors

Accurate use of pronouns

Clear match between the topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence in each body paragraph

Style & Mechanics

APA

Application of the requirements of the 7th APA manual to create a standardized formatted presentation

10

7th Ed. APA Manual is not followed or there are significant errors in:
title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are quite inadequate but do not rise to the level of plagiarism

7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with significant errors in:
title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are lacking but do not rise to the level of plagiarism

7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with minor errors in:
formatted title page, formatted references pages, in-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are adequately used in the correct context

7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with no errors including:
properly formatted title page, properly formatted references pages, in-text citations are correctly used, paraphrasing and direct quotes are properly used in the correct context

Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling

Use of proper English language grammar, spelling and punctuation to create a readable presentation.

10

Grammar and sentence structure has major problems following standard English rules and reads with difficulty with major errors in punctuation and spelling

Grammar and sentence structure has problems following standard English rules and reads with some difficulty with errors in punctuation and spelling

Grammar and sentence structure mostly follows standard English rules and reads reasonably well with few errors in punctuation and spelling

Grammar and sentence structure follows standard English rules and reads well with excellent punctuation and spelling

Readability & Style

Clarity of thought and appropriate level of language use that brings the author’s thoughts and ideas to the reader.

10

Sentences are lacking in completeness, clearness, conciseness and are not well-structured.
Transitions do not maintain flow of thought.
Words are ambiguous.
Tone is inappropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used.

Sentences need to be more complete, clear, concise and well-constructed.
Transitions do not maintain flow of thought well.
Words are not precise and have some ambiguity.
Tone is not appropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used too much.

Sentences are mostly complete, clear, concise and well-constructed.
Transitions mostly maintain flow of thought.
Words are mostly precise with little ambiguity.
Tone is mostly appropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used sparingly.

Sentences are consistently complete, clear, concise and well-constructed with strong, varied structure.
Transitions consistently maintain flow of thought.
Words are quite precise and unambiguous.
Tone is completely appropriate to audience/assessment. No colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing used.

Marks

100

Additional Comments