EFK 220 Tourism

EFK 220 Tourism

Question

Answered

Question 2: According to Ashley & Roe (2002) and Chok, Macbeth & Warren (2007) pro-poor tourism (PPT) has been a constant feature in radical tourism development and promotion since the early-1990s whereby fundamentally aiming to provide “net benefits” to the “poor”. From this observation formulate a critical analysis of the “harsh realities” or in other words, the “direct obstacles”, facing PPT as outlined by Scheyvens (2012) and subsequently critiqued by Harrison (2012). After your analysis explain and justify in your own words which of the aforementioned authors do you, in your professional capacity, agree with the most when it comes to the conceptualisation and contextualisation of the harsh realities associated with PPT in the global South. Apply the aforesaid findings respectively to any five (5) South African case studies (provincial) where PPT projects have successfully and sustainably been implemented in the country’s localised travelling environment. Your essay must include introductory and concluding sections. ***** (100) *please note the deadline can not be changed. Please use the provided sources.*