BUSN9181 Business Law Ethics And Governance

BUSN9181 Business Law Ethics And Governance

BUSN9181 Business Law Ethics and Governance


The concept of ‘good governance’ often emerges as a model to compare ineffectiveorganisations with effective organisations (or else to compare ineffective economies with healthy economies or ineffective political bodies with viable political bodies). Perhaps this is because, until recently, the majority of the ‘successful’ governments and companies in the contemporary world were found in liberal democratic states and concentrated in Europe and the Americas. As a result, it is these countries whose institutions tend to set the standards by which the companies and institutions of other states are compared.

The term ‘good corporate governance’ can be focused on different forms or types of ‘governance’. Organisations such as the United Nations or aid organisations and the authorities of developed countries often focus the meaning of ‘good governance’ on a set of requirements that conform to that entity’s particular agenda. As a result, ‘good governance’ may imply many different things in many different contexts.

You want to apply for this job and the application asks you to answer two questions:

The aim of this corporate governance reform project is to improve the functioning of the financial markets in ASEAN countries. Explain in this context:

(a) What does corporate governance mean?

(b) How and why corporate governance should be developed and what does it include?

(c) What does ‘good’ or ‘successful’ governance mean to you?

(d) What is required to improve corporate governance? Justify your answer.

(a) What factors would you study if you used the COSO Treadway Report as your guiding framework?

(b) Could the COSO/Treadway factors be studied from the published information of companies which are listed on ASEAN stock exchanges?

(c) What could you observe and assess about ASEAN financial markets by reviewing company reporting?

(d) If the average board in Cambodia has 4 executive directors and 2 nonexecutive directors and the average board in Indonesia had 1 executive director and 3 non-executive directors, what conclusions could you draw?

There is little research into corporate governance in emerging markets. As a result, recommendations for policy makers, companies as well as for investors usually focus on what ‘works in the West.’

However, some argue that a fundamental difference exists between the governance challenge in developed markets, where shareholders are many and dispersed (e.g. the UK and US), and the challenge in emerging markets (e.g. ASEAN) and elsewhere (e.g. Germany) where companies tend to be dominated by controlling shareholders (e.g. family members, a small group of business partners, a state-owned enterprise or a financial institution).

As a result, the solutions proposed for developed markets like the UK, where listed companies have many shareholders, may not address the governance weaknesses and be relevant to the issues found in countries where companies are dominated by controlling shareholders.

For example, the challenge for investors in emerging markets is determining how to weigh the risk factors associated with the country – weaknesses in the rule of law, risk of corruption, competitive intensity and lower capital market capabilities – against the firm-specific risk issues, especially the structure of ownership.

Those who want to invest in emerging market companies must make practical decisions about their investments on the basis of incomplete and at times conflicting information. Two dimensions of ownership structure may be important in that decision process: the quality of board independence and the mechanisms which are in place that are likely to mitigate (i.e. reduce) the risks associated with concentrated business control.

Research supports this view. It finds that director independence can make a difference in the performance of emerging market companies even though it does not appear to do so in US companies. Perhaps this is because in emerging markets a higher level of board independence results in company actions which are consistent with the best interests of shareholders and better firm performance.

This difference between developed and emerging markets suggests that boards may matter more in countries with weak or less well developed legal and regulatory systems.

Warning Signs Of Potential Problems
Opaque ownership structures.
Mismatch between economic stake and voting rights (e.g. different share classes that grant voting influence to controlling shareholders above their ownership stake).
Weak legal and regulatory environment for shareholder protection.
Lack of board independence and expertise.
No evidence of succession planning.
Poor disclosure about board practices
Lack of shareholder access to board members.
Poor disclosure about executive remuneration or remuneration policies that focus on short-term performance.
1. What is the potential problem with corporate governance codes like Cadbury? Discuss the governance problem when a company’s ownership structure is dominated by controlling shareholders. Justify your answer. (25 marks – maximum word limit 1200 words)
2. In emerging markets, many institutional investors expect that the boards of companies, controlled by families, other firms, or government, should have a meaningful number of independent directors to protect their minority interests. Prepare a briefing about director independence and what it can achieve in ASEAN listed companies.

(a) First, explain the risks/costs? and benefits of concentrated ownership;

(b) then, explain the background to the ‘independence’ issue;

(c) considering ‘independence’, what recommendations might be appropriate in the context of concentrated ownership in ASEAN. Justify your answer.

Our Essay Writing Service Features

Qualified Writers
Looming deadline? Get your paper done in 6 hours or less. Message via chat and we'll get onto it.
We care about the privacy of our clients and will never share your personal information with any third parties or persons.
Free Turnitin Report
A plagiarism report from Turnitin can be attached to your order to ensure your paper's originality.
Safe Payments
The further the deadline or the more pages you order, the lower the price! Affordability is in our DNA.
No Hidden Charges
We offer the lowest prices per page in the industry, with an average of $7 per page
24/7/365 Support
You can contact us any time of day and night with any questions; we'll always be happy to help you out.
$15.99 Plagiarism report
$15.99 Plagiarism report
$15.99 Plagiarism report
$15.99 Plagiarism report
$3.99 Outline
$21.99 Unlimited Revisions
Get all these features for $65.77 FREE
Do My Paper

Frequently Asked Questions About Our Essay Writing Service

Academic Paper Writing Service

Our essay writers will gladly help you with:

Business Plan
Presentation or Speech
Admission Essay
Case Study
Reflective Writing
Annotated Bibliography
Creative Writing
Term Paper
Article Review
Critical Thinking / Review
Research Paper
Thesis / Dissertation
Book / Movie Review
Book Reviews
Literature Review
Research Proposal
Editing and proofreading
Find Your Writer

Latest Feedback From Our Customers

Customer ID:  # 678224
Research Paper
Highly knowledgeable expert, reasonable price. Great at explaining hard concerts!
Writer: Raymond B.
Customer ID: # 619634
Essay (any type)
Helped me with bear and bull markets right before my exam! Fast teacher. Would work with Grace again.
Writer: Lilian G.
Customer ID: # 519731
Research Paper
If you are scanning reviews trying to find a great tutoring service, then scan no more. This service elite!
Writer: Grace P.
Customer ID: #499222
Essay (any type)
This writer is great, finished very fast and the essay was perfect. Writer goes out of her way to meet your assignment needs!
Writer: Amanda B.
Place an Order

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:

Powered by essayworldwide.com

× WhatsApp Us